Commentary for Bava Kamma 235:16

אמר רבא

R. Hisda, however, said: Where the proprietor had knowledge [of the theft], counting will exempt [the thief], whereas where he had no knowledge [of the theft], he would have to be notified [of the restoration], and the words, [HE] COUNTED THE SHEEP AND FOUND [THE HERD] COMPLETE, refer [only] to the first clause.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Dealing with a case where the proprietor most probably knew of the theft. ');">²⁵</span> Raba said:

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 235:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.